PIC defends its annual growth in AuM of just 2%

Expresses concern about reduced investment choice because of the spate of JSE delistings.
The PIC, which declared a dividend of R141m, is the largest holder of bonds in Eskom (R85.5bn), Transnet (R18.6bn) and Sanral (R13bn). Image: Moneyweb

Asset manager the Public Investment Corporation (PIC) has defended its performance in its financial year to end-March 2023 despite achieving growth of only 2% in total assets under management (AuM) to R2.599 trillion from R2.548 trillion in the prior year.

The PIC has also expressed concern about the spate of delistings on the JSE and the resultant reduction in investment choice and spoke about its investments in state-owned enterprises (SOEs) despite the huge challenges facing these entities.


Read: State-owned company pays a dividend

Among the PIC’s client investment portfolios:

  • The Government Employees Pension Fund (GEPF), representing 88.61% of total AuM, grew by 1.1% to R2.3 trillion.
  • The Unemployment Insurance Fund (UIF), comprising 5.14% of total AuM, grew by 13% to R135 billion.
  • The Compensation Commission Fund, accounting for 2.09% of total AuM, increased by 4.3% to R54.4 billion.

The assets of 15 smaller client funds, which make up the balance of the PIC’s total portfolio, grew by 7% to R61 billion.

The board of the PIC declared a dividend of R141 million for the year under review to the government, the PIC’s sole shareholder.

The Auditor-General (AG) issued an unqualified opinion on the PIC’s financial statements for the fifth consecutive year.

No significant instances of fruitless and wasteful expenditure were incurred, and no material findings or misrepresentations in the financial statements were raised by the AG.

‘Admirable returns’

The PIC said on Tuesday that considering weaker economic conditions and higher levels of risk aversion among major investors, its investment performance for 2022/23 delivered “admirable returns to the portfolios of all clients”.

PIC chief investment officer Kabelo Rikhotso said the return of the PIC on AuM must be put in context.

Rikhotso said the PIC used the Swix Adjusted for Property and Gaming benchmark in the past year, which was provided by its client, and delivered a 0.78% return.

He said the JSE SA Listed Property Index was down 3.3% over the period.

“Quite a huge part of your risk assets were flat or down, so you need to see that 2% return in that context,” he said.

Rikhotso said the PIC also compared very well with its asset management peers despite not having the same scope as them to invest outside the domestic market.

Private pension funds are allowed to invest up to 45% of their assets offshore.

“We[‘re] not anywhere close to that, but even with that, when you look at the ranking in which we participate, we fare very well compared to our peers,” he said.

PIC CEO Abel Sithole said the PIC continues to grow AuM, although maybe not at the pace it used to.

Assets under management growth from 2018 to 2023. Source: PIC Integrated Annual Report 2023

However, Sithole highlighted that it had to liquidate quite a significant portion of the UIF portfolio to support the Covid-19 pandemic Temporary Employer/Employee Relief Scheme (Ters), which reduced the asset base by R64 billion at that stage.

In addition, no contributions were made by the UIF at that point in time, and the PIC has not really been receiving contributions from its bigger clients because the benefits being paid now are larger than the contributions being made, he said.

“So the growth that you have seen is actually growth from what is being managed and not necessarily new money coming into the portfolio,” he said.

Delistings a challenge

Rikhotso said JSE delistings present a huge challenge from a listed investment perspective because it means the opportunities an asset manager trading in traditional stocks has keep reducing.

“It’s something that we are engaging with the JSE on to find out what we can do,” he said.

However, Rikhotso said the PIC has an opportunity to invest on the unlisted side, and there have been delistings where it decided not to sell but to retain its shares in the company.

Rikhotso cited the takeover by Heineken Beverages of Distell and Namibia Breweries in 2023, which led to the delisting of Distell from the JSE, as an example.

Read: Heineken, Distell deal passes all regulatory hurdles

“Where we see the opportunity to hold the investing company in the unlisted side, we will do so.

“Given the size of the portfolio we manage, we have tried to mitigate against those risks to ensure that we give ourselves options to hold some of the delisting shares in our unlisted portfolio.


“However, you still need to bring IPOs [initial public offerings] to the market, and we are engaging the JSE. They need to do something to relax the regulations,” he said.

“We know they are doing quite a lot to improve the environment, largely for your small and mid-cap entities.”

The PIC’s investments in listed equities grew by 7.9% over 12 months to R937 billion and delivered positive returns to clients.

Huge payoffs and discounts

Responding to a question about the difficult investment environment, Rikhotso said SA Inc is very cheap and in the bond market, at a 12% yield on a 10-year bond with the consumer price index (CPI) at 4.6%, “you are getting hugely compensated for the risk you are taking”.

“You are supposed to get 3% to 4% real, but you get 7%.

“On listed equity companies, especially the SA Inc ones, those are trading at huge discounts to NAVs [net asset values].

“If you look at the property market, you are seeing discounts to NAVs of anywhere between 30% and 50%. In some cases, it’s close to 60%.

Read/listen: Keillen Ndlovu on listed property being ‘out of favour’

“We know the market is very cheap, so from an asset allocation perspective, we like SA bonds, SA equities, but it is also important, given the size of the book that we manage, to diversify globally,” he said.

Rikhotso said the PIC has allocated some assets to emerging markets, especially China and third-party asset managers in East Asia, where it anticipates growth.

He said Africa is another exciting investment area, but it has adopted a partnership approach, as is evident from its investment of about $100 million (about R1.93 billion) into the Africa Finance Corporation (AFC) to get exposure to infrastructure investment on the continent.

Asset classes in the PIC’s portfolio as at 31 March 2023. Source: PIC Integrated Annual Report 2023

SOE investments

Sithole said any movement in the PIC’s investments in SOEs was not through a loss of faith in these enterprises but largely from maturities.

He admitted that SOEs have challenges, and the PIC is highly exposed to them in terms of how much it has invested in them.

He said the focus sometimes is only on the PIC’s investment in SOEs, but there is a much broader focus it is concerned about.

“It does not only revolve around exposure to SOEs but how those SOEs impact the rest of our portfolio of investments, and therefore, the way to approach those entities is first to work towards making sure that they are able to deliver on their mandate,” he said.

Sithole said that with the exception of one “very small default” by the Land Bank, none of the SOEs have defaulted, and they present some attractive investment opportunities.

The PIC’s annual report said it is the largest holder of bonds in Eskom (R85.5 billion), Transnet (R18.6 billion) and Sanral (R13 billion), and without this continued support through bond purchases, the borrowing costs for SOEs, such as Eskom, Transnet and Sanral would almost certainly have been substantially higher.

This, in turn, would have resulted in a further increase in the cost of basic services, such as electricity and transport, in an environment where elevated levels of electricity supply disruptions and deteriorating rail freight performance already constrain domestic output, it said.

Listen as Ryk van Niekerk speaks to PIC CEO Abel Sithole about the asset manager’s performance (or read the transcript here):

You can also listen to this podcast on iono.fm here.

This interview was originally aired on RSG Geldsake and has been translated into English in this transcript.



Sort by:
  • Oldest first
  • Newest first
  • Top voted

You must be signed in to comment.


or create a free account.

Free users can leave 4 comments per month.
Subscribers can leave unlimited comments via our website and app.

It is good to know that some organ of the state is feeling the heat due to the incompetence of the state. They have so many SOE bonds because no one else wants it. I hope they attribute the negative return they WILL see in the future to the state’s incompetence (rasist BEE policies is the largest contributor). I am happy to invest majority of my money offshore, where the cost of dealing/trading is without BEE, where the economy is not constantly declining, where there is not loadshedding and logistical issues like Transnet, where the currency remains strong, where there is more political stability and the list goes on…

If my assets were held by the PIC I would take as much as I can and run. Or in the case where they force you to have it under the PIC due to you working for the government, I would simply just cry and attempt to build another retirement plan on the side.

It’s a defined benefit fund, so there’s no investment risk to the pension fund member. The employer (in this instance the state) bears the ultimate investment risk

No such thing as as no investment risk. Currency debasement is but one of the risks these pensioners face.

End of comments.



Subscribe to our mailing list

* indicates required
Moneyweb newsletters

Follow us:

Search Articles:
Click a Company: